Egalitarisme Sosial

Refleksi Kritis atas Moral-Compass Kebijakan Publik tentang Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi 1998

  • M. Rodinal Khair Khasri Fakultas Filsafat Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta
Keywords: disability, social egalitarism, public policy, moralcompass, disabilitas, egaliterisme sosial, kebijakan publik, moral-compass

Abstract

This study aims to present an analytical perspective from the perspective of moral philosophy (ethics) and public policy on the existence of persons with disabilities in the context of national and state life. As a previous study conducted by Andriani (2016) that in addition to regulatory issues, policies that are responsive to disability at the regional, national and global levels are influenced by social systems and values in society. This research focuses on the moralcompass of the state apparatus in spawning policies about persons with disabilities, especially in paying attention to the social system and values that develop in society. The results of this study will be an academic supplement in addressing people with disabilities so that they are not merely based on mere moral assumptions that contain discriminatory latency. This research is library research with qualitative data analysis methods that refer to Alan Bryman's "analytical induction" model.

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menghadirkan perspektif analitis dari kacamata filsafat moral (etika) dan kebijakan publik tentang eksistensi penyandang disabilitas di dalam konteks kehidupan berbangsa dan bernegara. Sebagaimana penelitian sebelumnya yang dilakukan oleh Andriani (2016) bahwa selain persoalan regulasi, kebijakan yang responsif terhadap disabilitas di tingkat daerah, nasional dan global dipengaruhi oleh sistem sosial dan nilai dalam masyarakat. Penelitian ini fokus pada moral-compass aparatur negara di dalam menelurkan kebijakan tentang penyandang disabilitas, terutama di dalam memperhatikan sistem sosial dan nilai yang berkembang di masyarakat. Hasil penelitian ini akan menjadi suplemen akademis di dalam menyikapi penyandang disabilitas, sehingga tidak melulu disandarkan pada asumsi moral “belas-kasihan” belaka yang mengandung latensi diskriminatif. Penelitian ini tergolong ke dalam penelitian kepustakaan dengan metode analisis data kualitatif yang merujuk pada model “induksi analitis” Alan Bryman.

References

Aswegen, J. Van, Hyatt, D., & Goodley, D. (2019). A Critical Discourse Problematization Framework For (Disability) Policy Analysis: “Good Cop/Bad Cop” Strategy. Qualitative Research Journal, Vol. 19.
Birkland, T. A. (2015). An Introduction to the Policy Process (Theories, Concepts, and Models of Public Policy Making). New York: Routledge.
Byman, Alan. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th Edition). New York: Oxford University Press.
DeLapp, K. M. (n.d.). Metaethics. Retrieved November 10, 2019, from Converse College U. S. A. website: https://www.iep.utm.edu/metaethi/
Egalitarianism. In The Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. Retrieved November 24, 2019, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/egalitarianism
Fukuyama, F. (2010). Trust: Kebajikan Sosial dan Penciptaan Kemakmuran (Ruslani, Trans.). Yogyakarta: Qalam.
Grue, J. (2009). Critical Discourse Analysis, Topoi and Mystification: Disability Policy Documents From a Norwegian NGO. Discourse Studies, Vol 11 No.3.
https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/cacat. (2016). Retrieved November 16, 2019, from Badan Pengembangan Bahasa dan Perbukuan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia website: https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/cacat
Inklusi Penyandang Disabilitas di Indonesia. (n.d.). Retrieved November 11, 2019, from International Labour Organization (ILO) website: https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilojakarta/documents/publication/wcms_233426.pdf
Kite, M. E., & Bernard E. Whitley, J. (2016). Psychology of Prejudice and Discrimination (Third Edit). New York: Routledge.
LaFollette, Hugh & Persson, Ingmar. (2013). Introduction. In H. LaFollette & I. Persson (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing.
Laporan Kinerja 2018 (Direktorat Rehabilitasi Sosial Penyandang Disabilitas). (2019). Jakarta.
Lippert-Rasmussen, K. (2018). Relating to One Another As Equals. In Relational Egalitarianism: Living as Equals (pp. 61–93). chapter, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Maftuhin, A. (2016). Mengikat Makna Diskriminasi: Penyandang Cacat, Difabel, dan Penyandang Disabilitas. INKLUSI: Journal of Disability Studies, Vol. 3, No.2
Mahalli. (2018). Pandangan Islam tentang Hak-Hak Penyandang Disabilitas. Retrieved November 25, 2019, from http://psld.ub.ac.id/in/indonesia-pandangan-islamtentang-hak-hak-penyandang-disabilitas/
Nursyamsi, F., Arifianti, E. D., Aziz, M. F., Bilqish, P., & Marutama, A. (2015). Kerangka Hukum Disabilitas di Indonesia: Menuju Indonesia Ramah Disabilitas. Jakarta.
Penyandang Disabilitas pada Anak. (2014). InfoDATIN (Pusat Data Dan Informasi Kementerian Kesehatan RI).
Peters, B. G., & Zittoun, P. (Eds.). (2016). Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy: Theories, Controversies And Perspectives. London: Macmillan Pub lishers Ltd.
Rais, H. El. (2012). Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Rembis, M., Kudlick, C., & Nielsen, K. E. (Eds.). (2018). The Oxford Handbook of Disability History. New York: Oxford University Press.
Saputra, A., & Kampai, J. (2019). Selain drg Romi, Ini Sederet Kasus Diskriminasi Disabilitas di RI. Retrieved November 7, 2019, from https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4649112/selain-drg-romi-ini-sederet-kasus-diskriminasi-disabilitas-di-ri
Smith, Michael. (2013). Moral Realism. In H. LaFollette & I. Persson (Eds.), The Blackwell Guide to Ethical Theory. West Sussex: Blackwell Publishing.
Suparno, E. (2010). Grand Strategy Indonesia: Kajian Komprehensif Manajemen Pembangunan Negara-Bangsa. Jakarta Selatan: Penerbit Milestone.
Terzi, Lorella. (2004). The Social Model of Disability: A Philosophical Critique. Journal of Applied Philosophy, Vol. 21, No. 2.
Vehmas, S., & Watson, N. (2014). Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: a critique of critical disability studies. Disability & Society, Vol. 29.
Watson, N., Roulstone, A., & Thomas, C. (Eds.). (2012). Routledge Hanbook of Disability Studies. Oxon: Routledge
Published
2020-07-13
How to Cite
M. Rodinal Khair Khasri. (2020). Egalitarisme Sosial. The Indonesian Conference on Disability Studies and Inclusive Education, 1, 169-190. Retrieved from http://conference.uin-suka.ac.id/index.php/icodie/article/view/19