Ibrahim’s Discovery of God as a Representation of a Falsification Perspective (An Analysis QS. Al-An’am [6]: 74-79)

Shinta Tisia Azzahra; Zumma Nihayatun Nafi'ah

Authors

Shinta Tisia Azzahra UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Zumma Nihayatun Nafi'ah UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Ibrahim, Discovery of God, Falsification Perspective, QS. Al-An’am [6]: 74-79

Abstract

The study of the process of discovering God by Prophet Ibrahim in this study will be analysed with the representation of the falsification perspective. In previous research, QS. Al-An'am verses 74-79 were only studied based on historical, cosmological, and theological aspects. If traced back, there is an epistemological framework contained in the story of the discovery of God by Prophet Ibrahim. The structure of the story will be analysed based on the integration of the falsification perspective with the interpretation of QS. Al-An'am verses 74-79. This shows the epistemological results of QS. Al-An'am verses 74-79 as a representation of the falsification perspective. Among what is contained in this paper concerns the source of Prophet Ibrahim's knowledge, the method of seeking God's truth, and the epistemological principles that accompany it. Thus, this paper shows the narration of QS. Al-An'am verses 74-79 that contains a comprehensive scientific method, namely theological falsification. This shows the Qur'anic support for epistemology in the search for truth. Through the framework of falsification, the process of discovering God is not only a spiritual journey, but also an intellectual process to understand the existence and nature of the Creator.

References

Abubakar, Rifa’i. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. Yogyakarta: SUKA-Press UIN Sunan Kalijaga, 2021.

Atika, Nur, and Salminawati. ‘Filsafat Dan Sains Islam Tentang Fenomena Alam’. Journal Of Social Research 1, no. 5 (2022): 334–340.

Bahrum. ‘Ontologi, Epistemologi Dan Aksiologi’. Sulesana Jurnal Wawasan Keislaman 8, no. 2 (2013): 35–45.

Chalmers, A.F. What Is This Thing Called Science (Apa Itu Yang Dinamakan Ilmu). Jakarta. Hasta Karya, 1983.

Dewi, Subhani Kusuma. ‘Dialektika Integrasi Antara Psikologi Dan Islam Di Indonesia: Peluang Bagi Metode Eksperiensial’. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif 1, no. 1 (2013): 138.

Dinata, Syaiful. ‘Epistimologi Kritisisme Immanuel Kant’. Kanz Philosophia A Journal for Islamic Philosophy and Mysticism 7, no. 2 (2021): 217–236.

Dochmie, Mohammad Rivaldi. ‘Keilmiahan Ilmu-Ilmu Islam Ditinjau Dari Prinsip Falsifikasi Karl Popper’. Prosiding Konferensi Integrasi Interkoneksi Islam dan Sains 1 (2018): 145–150. http://sunankalijaga.org/prosiding/index.php/kiiis/article/view/23.

Erianti, Desi, M. Philo Al-Farabi, Selvi Darma Yanti, Sofie Fadma Sari, Suratin, and Sahrul Sori Alom Harahap. ‘Epistemologi Falsifikasi Karl R Popper’. INNOVATIVE: Journal Of Social Science Research 3, no. 2 (2023): 6799–6807.

Hafizh, Muhammad, Sarah Dina, Widia Astuti, and Nur Wahyu Ningsih. ‘Perbandingan Paradigma Epistemologi: Sumber Pengetahuan Perspektif Islam Dan Barat’. Risalah : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam Perbandingan 9, no. 4 (2023): 1496–1509.

Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jakarta: Panjimas, 1986.

Irawan, Bambang. ‘INTUISI SEBAGAI SUMBER PENGETAHUAN: Tinjauan Terhadap Pandangan Filosof Islam’. Jurnal THEOLOGIA 25, no. 1 (2016): 159–188.

Katsir, Ibnu. Tafsir Al-Qur’an Al-’Adzim. Jizah: Maktabah Aulad As-Syaik At-Turats, 2000.

Kemenag RI. Qur’an Kemenag. Jakarta: Kementerian Agama RI, 2019. https://quran.kemenag.go.id/.

Komarudin. ‘Falsifikasi Karl Popper Dan Kemungkinan Penerapannya Dalam Keilmuan Islam’. Jurnal at-Taqaddum 6, no. 2 (2014): 444–465.

Latief, Imam Zamroni. ‘Islam Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan’. Islamuna 1, no. 2 (2014): 151–169.

Makhmudah, Siti. ‘Hakikat Ilmu Pengetahuan Dalam Perspektif Modern Dan Islam’. AL-MURABBI: Jurnal Studi Kependidikan dan Keislaman 4, no. 2 (2017): 202–217.

Popper, Karl R. The Logic of Scientific Discovery (Logika Penemuan Ilmiah). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2008.

Qardawi, Yusuf. Al-Qur’an Berbicara Tentang Akal Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan, Terj. Abdul Hayyie Al-Kattani. Jakarta: Gema Insani Press, 1998.

Quthb, Sayyd. Tafsir Fi Zilalil Qur’an. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2002.

Rizma, Salsabila, and Eva Dewi. ‘Epistemologi : Rasionalisme, Empirisme, Kritisisme, Pragmatisme Positivisme Dan Positivisme Logis’. Sinar Dunia: Jurnal Riset Sosial Humaniora dan Ilmu Pendidikan 3, no. 1 (2024): 144–154.

Rozikin, Ahmad Zainor, and Ihawan Amalih. ‘Integrasi Agama Dan Sains Perspektif Teori Quantum Nidhal Guessoum’. MULTIVERSE: Open Multidisciplinary Journal 2, no. 3 (2023): 454–464.

Rustiani. ‘Mengantisipasi Fenomena Hoaks Bagi Pendidik Dengan Mengembangkan Rasionalisme Kritis’. Mindset : Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran 1, no. 2 (2021): 35–40.

Sari, Winda Patrika Embun. ‘Teori Falsifikasi Karl Popper’. Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen 1, no. 1 (2024): 1–12. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/popper/#Life.

Shihab, M. Quraish. Tafsir Al-Misbah: Pesan, Kesan, Dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an. Jakarta: Lentera Hati, 2006.

Syukri. ‘Pembelajaran Agama Bersifat Konkrit: Refleksi Pemikiran Rasionalis Ilmiah’. FITRAH: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan 2, no. 1 (2010): 1–19.

Vera, Susanti, and R. Yuli A. Hambali. ‘Aliran Rasionalisme Dan Empirisme Dalam Kerangka Ilmu Pengetahuan’. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin 1, no. 2 (2021): 59–73.

Yuslih, Muhammad. ‘Epistemologi Pemikiran Karl R Popper Dan Relevansinya Dengan Pemikiran Islam’. JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA 2, no. 9 (2021): 438–444.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Tafsir Al-Munir. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2016.