REVISITING ISLAMIC THEOLOGY: LIVED ECO-THEOLOGY IN CONTEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISM

Authors

  • Muizudi Muizudin Center for Religious and Cross-Cultural Studies, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Lived Eco-Theology, Environmental Activism, Ecological Crisis, Islamic Theology

Abstract

The environmental crisis demands a transformative response that draws from the richness of religious values. This research aims to re-elaborate the discourse on Islamic eco-theology as a profound response to modernity and environmental issues, while simultaneously critiquing the dominant tendency towards instrumentalism. Instrumentalism in the discourse on Islam and environment is considered problematic because it has narrowed the concept of religion to functional justifications. This approach triggers a human-nature dualism and encourages resource exploitation. Through conceptual analysis and a literature review, this research examines how the discourse on eco-theology is critiqued, operated, and developed. This research then constructs a new framework, namely lived eco-theology, as an effort to see the embodiment of religion in the practice of fluid environmental activism, inspired by the theory of lived religion. The lived eco-theology framework refers to a theology of environmental engagement that is manifested in three forms of integrated action: articulated, performative, and symbolic. This formulation considers ecological values ​​as the result of a hybridization between religious values ​​and intersecting values. This model is a conceptual contribution that shifts the perspective of Islamic ecological theology from merely instrumental ethics to a theology that is truly relevant and practiced. This framework is expected to be the basis for a religious-environmental movement that brings real and sustainable change and values ​​nature equally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdelzaher, D. M., Kotb, A., & Helfaya, A. (2019). Eco-Islam: Beyond the principles of why and what, and into the principles of how. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 623–643.

Ammerman, N. T. (2021). Studying lived religion: Contexts and practices. In Studying Lived Religion. New York University Press.

Bagir, Z. A., Maarif, S., Munjid, A., Vanderbilt, G., Ahnaf, M. I., & Laksana, A. B. (2015). Studi agama di Indonesia: Refleksi pengalaman. Program Studi Agama dan Lintas Budaya.

Bagir, Z. A., & Martiam, N. (2016). Islam: Norms and practices. In Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology (pp. 79–87). Routledge.

Effendi, M. R., & Setiadi, E. (2018). Religiusitas masyarakat adat kampung dukuh kabupaten garut jawa barat. INJECT (Interdisciplinary Journal of Communication), 3(1), 125–146.

Fatoni, A. (2024). Islam and the Environment. Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 7(2), 320–331.

Forest Wacth Indonesia. (2024, January 20). Nasib Hutan Indonesia di Ujung Tanduk. https://fwi.or.id/nasib-hutan-indonesia-di-ujung-tanduk/

Gade, A. M. (2019). Muslim environmentalisms: Religious and social foundations. Columbia University Press.

Gade, A. M. (2025). Environment, Sustainability, and the Work of Constructive Muslim Theology. The Muslim World.

Ganzevoort, R. R., & Roeland, J. (2014). Lived religion: The praxis of practical theology. International Journal of Practical Theology, 18(1), 91–101.

Haq, S. N. (2001). Islam and ecology: Toward retrieval and reconstruction. Daedalus, 130(4), 141–177.

Jenkins, W., & Chapple, C. K. (2011). Religion and Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 36(1), 441–463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-042610-103728

Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard university press.

Leopold, A. (1989). A Sand County almanac, and sketches here and there. Oxford University Press, USA.

Maarif, S. (2015). Being a Muslim in Animistic Ways. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 52(1), 149. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2014.521.149-174

Maarif, S. (2018). Indigenous religion paradigm: Re-interpreting religious practices of indigenous people. 哲学・思想論集/『哲学・思想論集』 編集委員会 編, 44, 56–38.

Malik, S. A. (2023). Challenges and Opportunities in Teaching Interdisciplinary Courses on Islam and Evolution: A Theology-Centric Perspective. Religions, 14(1), 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/rel14010095

Mangunjaya, F. M. (2023). How Islamic tradition benefits nature and climate change action. The Journal of the Siam Society, 111(2), 253–264.

McGuire, M. (2007). Embodied practices: Negotiation and resistance. Everyday Religion: Observing Modern Religious Lives, 187–200.

McGuire, M. B. (2008). Lived religion: Faith and practice in everyday life. Oxford University Press.

Miner, W., Corichi, M., Starr, K. J., & Evans, J. (2023, September 12). Religious practices. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2023/09/12/religious-practices-southeast-asia/

Muid, A., & Mustofa, A. M. Z. (2023). Religious Education as a Basic Component in the Formation of Quality Human Beings. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Education and Local Culture, 1(1), 37–46.

Nomay, U. (2019). Tuhan, Manusia Dan Alam Dalam (Borero Gosimo) Amanat Datuk Moyang Tidore. Al-Qalam, 25(1), 15–32.

PPIM UIN Jakarta. (2024). Green Islam Setengah Hati? Potret Muslim Ramah Lingkungan di Indonesia. https://ppim.uinjkt.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/Launching- Green-Islam-2024-_230724.pdf

Rahman, M. A. (2025). The significance of religious values in forming sustainable life and economic progress. International Journal of Scientific Interdisciplinary Research, 6(1), 60–87.

Rakhmat, A. (2022). Islamic Ecotheology: Understanding The Concept Of Khalifah And The Ethical Responsibility Of The Environment. Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy, 3(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.22515/ajipp.v3i1.5104

Rohmah, N. N. (2018). Berdampingan dengan leluhur di masa depan: Historisitas, lanskap, dan artikulasi identitas Masyarakat Tengger Senduro. Masyarakat Indonesia, 44(2), 76–87.

Roothaan, A. (2019). Indigenous, modern and postcolonial relations to nature: Negotiating the environment. Routledge.

Saunders, C. (2013). Environmental networks and social movement theory. Bloomsbury Academic.

Tucker, M. E., & Grim, J. (2016). The movement of religion and ecology: Emerging field and dynamic force. Routledge Handbook of Religion and Ecology, 3–12.

Tuhri, M., Maarif, S., & Simarmata, R. (2020). Adat, Islam, and the idea of religion in colonial Indonesia. Al Albab, 9(2), 159–178.

Wasil, W., & Muizudin, M. (2023). Ekoteologi dalam Menyikapi Krisis Ekologi di Indonesia Perspektif Seyyed Hossein Nasr. Refleksi: Jurnal Kajian Agama Dan Filsafat, 22(1), 179–202.

White Jr, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.

Whyte, K. (2018). Critical Investigations of Resilience: A Brief Introduction to Indigenous Environmental Studies & Sciences. Daedalus, 147(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00497

Wijanarto, W. (2018). Harmoni Di Kaki Gunung Kumbang Ngasa, Komunitas Jalawastu dan Jejak Sunda di KabupatenBrebes. Aceh Anthropological Journal, 2(2), 37–54.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

REVISITING ISLAMIC THEOLOGY: LIVED ECO-THEOLOGY IN CONTEMPORARY ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVISM. (2026). International Student Conference, 1(1), 110-120. https://conference.uin-suka.ac.id/index.php/isc/article/view/1812