BETWEEN TRADITION AND MODERNITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF PESANTREN RATIONALITY AMID THE DISRUPTIVE ERA

Authors

  • Ahmad Baehaki Master of Qur’anic Exegecis, Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Pesantren, Phenomenology, Rationality, Tradition, Disruptive Era

Abstract

The pesantren is a distinctive Islamic educational institution of the Indonesian archipelago that has played a crucial role in shaping the intellectual and spiritual character of Indonesian society. It embodies a unique form of rationality and religiosity that differs from both secular educational institutions and modern Islamic schools. However, the disruptive era—marked by technological acceleration and the dominance of instrumental rationality—has challenged the ways in which humans understand knowledge, authority, and spirituality, including within the pesantren context. Within the framework of secular rationality, pesantren are often simplistically perceived as conservative or even feudal institutions. This study seeks to reconsider such perceptions by examining the rationality of pesantren through a phenomenological approach. Drawing upon Edmund Husserl’s concept of intentionality and Alfred Schutz’s notion of the lifeworld, this research explores the consciously lived meanings experienced by pesantren actors—kiai, ustaz, and santri—in their everyday activities such as studying classical Islamic texts (kitab kuning), performing khidmah, and maintaining the kiai–santri relationship. The findings reveal that pesantren rationality is rooted in a meaningful consciousness that integrates faith, reason, and tradition—a form of substantive or value-oriented rationality distinct from modern calculative rationality. Activities such as textual study and khidmah embody intentional awareness oriented toward truth and blessing (telos), rather than mere efficient social compliance. Phenomenological reflection shows that the kiai–santri relationship is not an expression of feudal hierarchy but an intersubjective space where knowledge and ethical conduct are practiced existentially. Thus, the pesantren can be understood as a religious lifeworld that represents an alternative mode of rationality amid digital modernity—one that rejects the dichotomy between faith and reason while offering a harmonious synthesis between tradition and modernity. This study contributes to contemporary Islamic epistemology by reaffirming the relevance of the pesantren tradition in reinterpreting the relationship between faith and reason in the disruptive era.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahimsa-Putra, H. S. (2012). Fenomena Agama: Pendekatan Fenomenologi untuk Memahami Agama. Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 20(2), 271–304. https://doi.org/10.21580/ws.20.2.200

Arianto, B., & Handayani, B. (2024). Pengantar Studi Fenomenologi. Borneo Novelty Publishing.

Arifin, A. Z. (2013). Charisma and Rationalisation in a Modernising Pesantren: Changing Values in Traditional Islamic Education in Java [PhD]. University of Western Sydney.

Badan Pengembanan dan Pembinaan Bahasa. (2016). Hasil Pencarian—KBBI VI Daring. KBBI VI Daring. https://kbbi.kemdikbud.go.id/entri/disrupsi

Bashrowi, M. (2004). Teori Sosiologi dalam Tiga Paradigma. Yayasan Kampusina.

Bertens, K. (2002). Filsafat Kontemporer, Inggris-Jerman. Gramedia.

Bruinessen, M. V. (2012). Kitab Kuning, Pesantren dan Tarekat. Gading Publishing.

Daulay, M. (2010). Filsafat Fenomenologi: Suatu Pengantar (A. M. D. Faza, Ed.). Panjiaswaja Press.

Dhofier, Z. (2011). Tradisi Pesantren: Studi Pandangan Hidup Kyai dan Visinya Mengenai Masa Depan Indonesia. LP3S.

Dona, R., Novela, D., & Nur, A. (2025). Rasionalitas Instrumental dan Dominasi Sistemik dalam Masyarakat Digital: Perspektif Neo-Marxis dan Teori Kritis Frankfurt Terhadap Perkembangan Konseptual Masyarakat Kontemporer. 4(1), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.46773/djce.v4i1

Fukuyama, F. (1999). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and The Reconstitution of Social Order. Profile Books.

Hardiman, F. B. (2003). Heidegger dan Mistik Keseharian: Suatu Pengantar Menuju Sein und Zeit (C. M. Udiani, Ed.). Gramedia.

Hidayat, M. R. (2021). Kisah Yajuj Majuj dalam Tafsir Al-Azhar: Analisis Intertekstualitas Julia Kristeva. J-Alif : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Dan Budaya Islam, 6(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.35329/jalif.v6i1.2206

Hindess, B. (1991). Rationality and Modern Society. American Sociological Association, 9(2), 216–227.

Howell, J. D. (2014). Sufism and the Indonesian Islamic Revival. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(3), 701–729. https://doi.org/10.2307/2700107

Ilahi, M. T. (2014). Kiai: Figur Elite Pesantren. IBDA` : Jurnal Kajian Islam Dan Budaya, 12(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.24090/ibda.v12i2.442

Jochnson, D. P. (1994). Teori Sosiologi Klasik dan Modern. Gramedi Pustaka.

Kasali, R. (2018). Self Disruption. Mizan.

Khozin, W. (2006). Rasionalitas. EDUKASI: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Agama Dan Keagamaan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.32729/edukasi.v4i1.403

Lee, M. E. (2021). Weber and the Rational Society | Research Starters | EBSCO Research. EBSCO. https://www.ebsco.com

Lestari, P. (2022). Tradisi Penulisan Dan Pengajaran Kitab Pesantren: Proses Membangun Otoritas Dalam Kitab Kuning. Jurnal Kajian Islam Interdisipliner, 7(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.14421/jkii.v7i2.1331

Lukens-Bull, R. A. (2001). Two Sides of the Same Coin: Modernity and Tradition in Islamic Education in Indonesia. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 32(3), 350–372.

Lumowa, V. (2016). Modernisasi dan Manusia Kontemporer. Respons: Jurnal Etika Sosial, 21(1), 51–87.

Maliki, N. (2021). Pesantren di Era Disrupsi. Publica Institute Jakarta.

Masyhudi, A. R. (2000). Feodalisme dan Pesantren (Studi tentang Unsur-Unsur Feodalisme dalam Pesantren) [Bachelor]. IAIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Membongkar Feodalisme di Balik Tabir “Adab” Pesantren. (2025, October 14). Omong-Omong Media. https://omong-omong.com/membongkar-feodalisme-di-balik-tabir-adab-pesantren/

News, S. (2025, October 4). Musibah Pondok Roboh: Antara Klarifikasi Kiai dan Rasionalitas Publik. serikatnews.com. https://serikatnews.com/musibah-pondok-roboh-antara-klarifikasi-kiai-dan-rasionalitas-publik/

Oey-Gardiner, M., Rahayu, S. I., Abdullah, M. A., Effendi, S., Darma, Y., Dartanto, T., & Aruan, C. D. (2017). Era Disrupsi: Peluang dan Tantangan Pendidikan Tinggi Indonesia. Akademi Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia.

Phillipson, M. (1972). Phenomenological Philosophy and Sociology. In New Directions in Sociological Theory. Collier MacMillan,.

Siswanto, I., & Yulita, E. (2019). Eksistensi Pesantren dengan Budaya Patronase (Hubungan Kiai Dan Santri). MITRA ASH-SHIBYAN: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 2(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/10.46963/mash.v2i1.27

Sutrisno, FX. M., & Hardiman, F. B. (1992). Para Filsuf Penentu Gerak Zaman. Kanisius.

Wasim, A. A. (n.d.). Titik Temu Islam Nusantara Berkemajuan dalam Perspektif Fenomenologi Edmund Husserl (1859 – 1938). An-Nur: Jurnal Studi Islam, 10(1).

Weber, M. (1968). Economy and Society: An Outline Of Intepretative Sosiology. Universitas Of California Pres.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-21

How to Cite

BETWEEN TRADITION AND MODERNITY: A PHENOMENOLOGICAL STUDY OF PESANTREN RATIONALITY AMID THE DISRUPTIVE ERA. (2026). International Student Conference, 1(1), 65-77. https://conference.uin-suka.ac.id/index.php/isc/article/view/1840